| The Reality of Gnosis ('irfan) |
|
|
|
| Written by Ayatullah Muhsin Araki |
| Friday, 10 July 2009 00:00 |
|
Abstract This paper presents an experiential introduction to the reality of mysticism illustrated extensively with quotations from the great Persian Sufi poets. It addresses the nature of mysticism, its subject of study that is the divine essence, its faculty of perception that is the heart and its results in godly action. Ultimately it demonstrates how mystical discourse and knowledge is rooted in the Islamic revelation and the sayings and teachings of the Prophet and his progeny. Gnosis or mystical knowledge possesses many traits and characteristics that serve to distinguish it from other forms of knowledge. In this paper, we shall attempt to point out some of the most significant of these characteristics, thus distinguishing this particular form of knowledge from others, to the degree possible in such a short work. I: Direct knowledge
As defined by logicians, knowledge consists of the presence of the ‘form’ of the known before the knower. This definition applies to all conventional branches of science and scholarship. Normal knowledge never constitutes the immediate presence of the essence of the known before the knower. Thus, no scholar or scientist may perceive the object of his study directly, without the mediation of forms. In general, all scientific knowledge is indirect knowledge, in that the scientist always perceives the form of what he is studying, and then, through knowledge of this form, perceives the essence of the object of his investigation. Moreover, this rule applies to Islamic studies as well. Even those fields of learning that are very close to mystical knowledge in their aim and subject matter, such as Islamic jurisprudence or philosophy, are not exempt from this general principle. Islamic jurisprudence and philosophy are both indirect cognitions of the manifestations of the divine, the difference being that jurisprudence has as its subject ethical and normative signs and manifestations, while philosophy is concerned with natural ones. Knowledge attained in both of these fields is, like all other fields of scholarship, of the mediated type, where the known is perceived by the knower through its form. In this form of knowledge, al-ma‘l£m bi l-dh¡t (the known-in-itself, that is, the idea or form of the object known), is not the same as al-ma‘l£m bi l-‘ara¤ (the object itself), and what is united with the essence of the knower and is added to it is not the objective essence of the known but only an ideal form of it, which, naturally, is something different from it, though, because of the fact that it is a revelation of the object itself, enjoys essential unity with it. In other words, this unity is a unity in the sense of ‘primary predication’ (al-¦aml al-awwal¢), the basis of which is essence (m¡hiyya) and the concept (mafh£m), and not a unity in the sense of ‘common predication’ (al-¦aml al-sh¡’i‘), the basis of which is unity in being. The significant characteristic of mystical knowledge is that it does not fall within the category of acquired knowledge (ma‘¡rif-i ¦u¥£l¢). It is, on the contrary, a form of knowledge by presence (ma‘rifat-i ¦u¤£r¢), in which it is the essence of the object itself that is perceived and not an idea of it. In other words, in this form of perception, the essence, meaning the objective reality of the known, is identical with the knowledge attained by the knower. It follows, then, that mystical knowledge is immediate and direct perception, without any reliance on intermediation of idea or image. In this aspect, then, it is different from all other forms of knowledge.
In the mystical quest for the truth, the aim of the seeker is, first and foremost, to reach a particular destination. Knowledge, then, follows in the wake of this attainment. In the case of ordinary forms of knowledge it is precisely the opposite, in that the aim is to know. Such knowledge may then lead to the attainment of the thing itself, although it is by no means certain that it will do so. To sum up then, knowledge does not necessitate arrival, while knowledge constitutes an inseparable aspect of attainment. In the Qur’an, the word ‘ilm (knowledge) generally refers to mystical knowledge, which signifies arrival at, and the attainment of, the object of knowledge. Thus, from the Qur’anic viewpoint, perfect and fruitful knowledge is that which leads to man’s spiritual development and enables him to reach his destination. It is for the reasons set forth above that mystical insight gives birth to wisdom, which is profound and comprehensive understanding of the truth. An understanding able to reveal all aspects of the truth, its roots, results and manifold relations with other realities can only be gained by attaining the truth itself. In abstract knowledge, which is perception of the form of an object, also known as acquired or formal knowledge (since it relies on form and idea), the final result is a picture of reality that is, in some cases, partial and incomplete. In many instances, then, this image-making process produces a picture of reality with color and properties very different from those of the original object. As a result, it not only does not reveal reality, but also becomes a veil that hides the truth from the perceiver.
Thus, the truth and spirit of wisdom is mysticism, and the fruit of real mysticism is perfect wisdom:
This is the same wisdom that has been referred to by the Qur’an as ‘the great benefit’ (khayr-i kath¢r) 4 and is the best present that the prophets have made to mankind, and the best teachers of which have been the same divinely inspired prophets, the best of whom is Muhammad, may God bless him and his progeny.
II: The subject of mysticism is the essence of God The subject of mystical knowledge is the holy essence of the supreme Truth (dh¡t-i aqdas-i °aqq muta‘¡l), while in all other forms of learning, even in jurisprudence and philosophy, it is God’s signs and manifestations that are being investigated. For in all such sciences and disciplines, one or another of God’s effects or manifestations is subjected to scientific or scholarly investigation and analysis, while the object of mystical knowledge is the holy essence of God Himself. Here, all His effects and manifestations are seen to be dissolved therein and serve merely to reflect His holy essence.
The ‘false expectation’ mentioned above is that of attaining the ‘true knowledge’ referred to by the Prophet when he said, "We cannot truly know You (m¡ ‘arafn¡ka ¦aqqa ma‘rifatika)". It is also the subject of the request Moses makes of God: "O Lord, may I see you?," to which God answers, "I cannot be seen (lan tar¡n¢)". 6 It is also the phoenix that, according to °¡fe¨, cannot be trapped.
If, however, the attainment of perfect knowledge of God, which entails removal of all veils and boundaries that separate the seeker from the Beloved, is not possible, the removal of the ‘self’, which is the greatest of veils, is possible. It is this station of knowledge, consisting of the annihilation and dissolution of the individual self in God and its rebirth in the Divine, that is the goal of the mystic.
That ‘bowed frame’ from which one can aim an arrow at the eye of the enemy is no other than the soul that has undergone mortification and has submitted to God’s will. As the result of this submission and mortification, it has gained the power to turn its back on everything except God, and this is identical with the aforementioned station of annihilation (fan¡’).
III: The faculty of mystical knowledge is the heart In mystical knowledge the faculty of cognition is the very center of human awareness (the ‘I’), also referred to as the ‘heart,’ while in other forms of knowledge, the faculty of perception is one of man’s external faculties. All ordinary knowledge, whether sensual or rational, is gained through the faculties of the mind, reason or the senses, all of which constitute the lower reaches of the self, or, to put it another way, are faculties created and developed by the self. On the other hand, man’s self possesses a core, referred to as the heart, which constitutes the basis of his true life, and the death of which signals the termination of his real life and his fall into the jaws of death. For example, God addresses His Prophet in the following manner:
The ‘dead’ referred to in the above verse are those who, in the words of the Qur’an, are ‘dead at heart’. In other words, they are human beings whose hearts have stopped functioning and have been sealed:
When this ‘heart’, which is the center of man’s true life, stops functioning, his powers of sight and hearing and the other powers and faculties of his real life also cease working, just as it has been pointed out in the above verse and in other Qur’¡nic verses. On the other hand, when the ‘heart’ is alive and vibrant, man’s real life flourishes and his other faculties become lively, sharp and vibrant. It is in this condition that man becomes ready to accept the Truth that his inner being is illuminated by remembrance of God, and the way leading to union with the holy essence of the Almighty God is opened to him:
In the holy Qur’¡n, the loss of the ‘heart’ is equated with final and ultimate loss and is regarded as the greatest of all defeats and deprivations:
In the following verse the loss of the vital power of the ‘heart’, which is its ability to hear and see, is considered to be the ultimate loss of the self:
Thus, it is in the heart that God is remembered and contacted and it is also the center of man’s spiritual life and of his power of intuition and spiritual insight. This Qur’¡nic concept is one of the central themes of Islamic mystical literature, expressed in various forms. For example, in the following verses, R£m¢ states it in this manner:
°¡fe¨ says:
The physical senses have no role whatsoever in this mode of perception:
And:
Nor can ordinary reason be of any assistance on this path:
IV: Mystical knowledge leads to action One of the characteristics of mystical knowledge is that it leads to action (‘amal). Whenever it penetrates a heart, it transforms it. The transformation of the heart signifies change in the very essence of a human being. This transformation is accompanied by the purification of the heart and the sharpening and purifying of one’s inner, spiritual and intuitive perceptions. These would be impossible unless the individual humbles himself before the Beloved, the Supreme Reality.
In other words, in the science of love, in order to ascend to the highest point, one must descend to the lowest; that is, it is only by humbling itself that the soul may attain dissolution and annihilation in the divine Essence. It is impossible to reach high mystical states unless the individual self humbles itself before God and carries out His commands unconditionally, and this is not possible unless one thoroughly submits to the authority of His representatives and carries out their commands without hesitation.
It is for this reason that mystical knowledge is always accompanied by action. He who attains the heights of this form of insight shall find that his whole being has become spiritualized and his thoughts and actions have taken on the imprint of the Beloved. In contrast, intellectual knowledge is impotent and fruitless, in that it does not by itself lead to action nor require any particular transformation on the part of the human soul; it affects the mind and not the heart. If one so wills, it is translated into action, and if not, it will remain in the storehouse of the mind and may even be accompanied with behavior that directly contradicts it. This is the nature of all ordinary forms of knowledge, for they all deal with the mind and do not have the intrinsic power to shape one’s behavior. On the other hand, mystical knowledge naturally orients and forms the individual’s behavior and transforms it for the better. It can, therefore, be said that conventional forms of knowledge are like lights that illuminate the way for travelers, while mystical knowledge propels the seeker toward his objective, creating fervor, enthusiasm and movement.
In the holy Qur’an, where the word ‘ilm (knowledge) is used to signify the kind of insight that leads to seeking and action, reference is to mystical knowledge. For example, consider the following verses:
In many Qur’anic verses the terms ‘reason’ (‘aql) and ‘understanding’ (fiqh) are used in such a manner as to indicate mystical insight and are therefore accompanied by such concepts as guidance toward man’s aim in life, self-purification and right action. For example, we have the following verses:
The reason for the fact that impurity is the result of a lack of contemplation (ta‘aqqul) is that this form of contemplation is the path of purity, and those who try to travel this path without sincerity and purity will reap nothing but impurity from it. Mystical insight is a fruit of the purity referred to in the above verse, a purity that is accompanied by right action and practice. In any case, in the verses mentioned above, and in similar ones, contemplation, jurisprudence and knowledge refer to mystical insight, and are therefore accompanied by practical effects. It is for this reason that this form of contemplation and understanding is considered by the Quran as a function of man’s free will, and its loss is judged as the greatest sin committed by evil-doers. The denizens of Hell are quoted in the Quran in the following manner:
In Persian mystical literature this characteristic of mystical knowledge has received special attention and has been the subject of beautiful verses. For example, Mawlana Jalal al-Din Rumi discusses this issue on a number of occasions, the following being one instance:
The poem continues until we reach the following lines:
It should be pointed out here that the fact that mystical knowledge has a practical nature does not mean that those who gain it inevitably and invariably continue their journey upon the spiritual path. In other words, it does not cancel the seeker’s free will and force him to ascend the higher rungs of the spiritual ladder, achieve proximity to God, and finally attain union with the Divine. On the contrary, in spite of having attained even the highest levels of spiritual illumination the seeker faces the ever-present danger of a sudden fall. In fact, the plunge from the heights of such spiritual knowledge is extremely terrible and painful, and is generally fatal and irreversible. If those who have succeeded in attaining the heights of spiritual knowledge, and before whose eyes the veils that hide profound and occult truths have been drawn aside, turn their backs on all that they have seen and tasted and descend from those exalted heights, their chances of salvation shall be slim indeed. Moreover, the higher the station they may have attained the more painful and devastating the fall shall be. The glorious Qur’an gives a number of instances in this regard, two of which are discussed below. 1. The first account concerns Bal‘am bin Ba‘awr¡’, a Jewish man of great learning who had reached very high levels of mystical insight, so much so that he is referred to as "he on whom We bestowed our signs." However, he ultimately turned his back on the Goal and, in spite of all the divine signs that had been granted him, retreated from the path he had traveled and therefore suffered a fall so terrible that it is referred to in the Qur’¡n as ‘mixing forever with the earth.’
2. The second story involves the followers of Jesus Christ. Although things work out well for them in the end, it points out the fact that infidelity to the truth on the part of those who have attained genuine and high levels of spiritual knowledge is extremely hard and painful.
The severity of the punishment for disbelief, that God promises shall follow the divine feast proves what was indicated above; namely, that the more profound the spiritual truths revealed, and the higher the level of certitude attained, the greater shall the damage and pain also be in case of a fall. V: Mystical knowledge and love Mystical knowledge is attachment, not description (it falls within the category of love, not representational knowledge).
In ordinary forms of (representational) knowledge, the relationship between the knower and the known is that of perception and description (¦ik¡yat), and therefore does not require any form of unification or identification between the two. It can be likened to the relationship between a mirror and the objects it reflects. Mystical knowledge, however, requires such identification, since it is attachment and does not consist of perception and description. That is, the mystic disappears in his Beloved and this dissolution and annihilation, which is identical with attachment to the Beloved, is the real nature of mystical knowledge. This attachment and annihilation is that which is understood as love. The reality of love, then, is none other than annihilation and dissolution of the individual self in the holy essence of the Supreme Truth through losing oneself entirely in one’s love for Him. Attachment to any other thing is nothing but illusion and fantasy, and love for anything else is not true love but a passing infatuation:
And:
It is for the above-mentioned reason that mysticism can be defined as the science of becoming like the known to such a degree that one attains complete identification with it. At this stage the seeker is annihilated and dissolved in it. The ladder by which the seeker ascends towards this annihilation and dissolution in God is love. This ability to become like the Beloved, to love, and to liberate the soul from the material body, is a very special characteristic of man, something that no other creature, not even angels, possess. The source of this love and spirituality is none other than the ‘breathing’ mentioned in the Qur’¡n: "I breathed my spirit into him".25 It is indeed this divine breath that is the cause of this tumult and uproar, and which drives man towards the Beloved.
This is the same divine inspiration that has raised man from lifeless earth to the unique station of God’s viceroy on earth, dressed him in the robe of honor, and made him worthy of veneration by angels.
Angels are manifestations of reason, and thus do not partake of love. With man’s creation, love entered the world and gave it vitality, warmth and movement. In the realm of reason things are undifferentiated and uniform. What exists and must exist exists and what does not exist and must not exist does not exist. That is all. But that being which is intermingled with nothingness arises out of non-existence and soars towards infinite being, is love. It transcends reason. It is in the realm of love where the visible and the invisible, the outward and the inward, matter and spirit, mix and God manifests Himself in the form of His Names. It is here that the universe comes to life, is filled with vitality, need and desire, giving rise to a movement that begins from the boundaries of non-existence and extends into infinity. In the words of °¡fe¨, it is love that has set the world aflame, filling it with passion, fervour and ecstasy.
Thus, angels, who are manifestations of reason, failed to understand the secret of Adam’s creation, and God revealed this secret through the science of Names. The divine Names, as explained in numerous narrations, 26 are the holy spirits of the prophet Muhammad and his progeny. These are the manifestations of the divine Essence and perfect representations of divine love in the world of creation. It is indeed for this very reason that the way to pay back the Prophet Muhammad for his mission and teachings is love for him and his descendants. For the soul of external religious observances (shar¢‘a) is none other than the inner spiritual path (§ar¢qa). It is in this inner spiritual realization that the external observances bear fruit. Without this inner insight, man is nothing but a lifeless corpse. Finally, the inner path is true love alone and can be summed up in total obedience to the authority and guidance of Muhammad and his progeny.
And:
Notes: 1-Mawl¡n¡ Jal¡l al-d¢n R£m¢ (d. 1274), perhaps the greatest Persian Sufi poet. Born in Balkh in present-day Afghanistan, he moved to Konya in Anatolia where he founded a Sufi brotherhood. He was buried in Konya and his tomb has become a major Sufi centre of learning and practice. He is best known of two works of poetry, the didactic anecdotal collection of stories, the Mathnav¢, and his collection of mystical odes dedicated to his inspiration Shams-i Tabr¢z¢, known as the D¢v¡n-i kab¢r-i Shams-i Tabr¢z¢. See the recent work of Franklin Lewis, Rumi: past and present, East and West, Oxford: Oneworld Publications 1999. 2-Shams al-D¢n Mu¦ammad °¡fe¨ Sh¢r¡z¢ (d. 1389), great Persian lyric poet and master of the ghazal form. See A.J. Arberry, Classical Persian Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1958, pp. 329-63. 3-Shaykh Bah¡’ al-D¢n Mu¦ammad ibn °usayn al-‘ªmil¢ (d. 1621), Safavid polymath and Shaykh al-Isl¡m in Isfahan under Sh¡h ‘Abb¡s I. For a study of his literary achievements, see C.E. Bosworth, Bah¡’ al-D¢n al-‘ªmil¢ and his literary anthologies, Manchester: Manchester University Press 1989. 4-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Baqara 2: 269. 5-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Jum‘a 62: 2 6-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-A‘r¡f 7: 143. 7-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Namal 27: 80 8-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Na¦l 16: 108-109 9-Qur’¡n, S£rat Q¡f 50: 37 10-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Na¦l 16: 108-109 11-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-H£d 11: 20-21 12-R£m¢, Mathnav¢, daftar II: 73-74 13-R£m¢, Mathnav¢, daftar II: 49-50 14-R£m¢, Mathnav¢, daftar I: 3445 15-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-F¡§ir 35: 28 16-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Isr¡’ 17: 107-109 17-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Muj¡dila 58: 11 18-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-°ajj 22: 46 19-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-A‘r¡f 7: 179 20-Qur’¡n, S£rat Y£nus 10: 100 21-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-Mulk 67: 10 22-R£m¢, Mathnav¢, daftar I: 3446-3461 23-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-A‘r¡f 7: 175-176 24-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-M¡’ida 5: 112-115 25-Qur’¡n, S£rat al-°ijr 29: 15 and S£rat ¯¡d 72: 38. 26-That is, a¦¡d¢th or reports from the Prophet and the Sh¢‘ite Im¡ms. |



